<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Doorway with LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchblogtheory.org/2009/11/12/another-doorway-with-linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchblogtheory.org/2009/11/12/another-doorway-with-linkedin/</link>
	<description>Engaging the Internet for the Glory of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://churchblogtheory.org/2009/11/12/another-doorway-with-linkedin/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchblogtheory.org/?p=571#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Very interesting suggestion. We&#039;ve focused our efforts more on Facebook and Twitter, but of course Linked In is the obvious next step to take. Have you seen a strong response through Linked In either in your church body or through those outside your congregation? We have a pretty tech savvy congregation, and I know a lot of them are on Linked In.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting suggestion. We&#8217;ve focused our efforts more on Facebook and Twitter, but of course Linked In is the obvious next step to take. Have you seen a strong response through Linked In either in your church body or through those outside your congregation? We have a pretty tech savvy congregation, and I know a lot of them are on Linked In.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

